Telemedicine Talks

#16 - A Doctor’s Breakup with Telemedicine

Episode Summary

Dr. Mark Chmiela, joins Phoebe Gutierrez and Dr. Leo Damasco to share his journey with telemedicine during and after COVID. From managing chronic pain to navigating insurance hurdles, get insights on the pros and cons of virtual care.

Episode Notes

Sponsored by: Set For Life

Set For Life Insurance helps doctors safeguard their future with True Own Occupational Disability Insurance. A single injury or illness can change everything, but the best physicians plan ahead. Protect your income and secure your future before life makes the choice for you. Your career deserves protection—act now at https://www.doctorpodcastnetwork.co/setforlife

_______________

In this episode, Dr. Mark Chmiela sits down with hosts Phoebe Gutierrez and Dr. Leo Damasco to discuss his experience with telemedicine in a busy Las Vegas pain management practice. Dr. Chmiela shares how telemedicine was a lifeline during COVID, allowing continuity of care for chronic pain patients when in-person visits were restricted. He explains the shift back to in-person care in 2024 due to insurance reimbursement cuts, regulatory challenges, and concerns about fraud. Despite these hurdles, Dr. Chmiela sees telemedicine as a valuable tool to reduce barriers for patients with transportation or mobility issues, though he emphasizes the irreplaceable value of in-person connections. The conversation also touches on niche treatments like IV hydration and the importance of informed consent in elective therapies.

Three Actionable Takeaways:

  1. Use Telemedicine Strategically – Incorporate telemedicine for stable chronic pain patients or those with mobility issues to reduce barriers, but prioritize in-person visits for new symptoms or physical exams.
  2. Monitor Insurance Policies – Stay informed about changing reimbursement rules for telemedicine to ensure financial sustainability in your practice.
  3. Embrace Technology Thoughtfully – Adopt telemedicine to enhance patient access, but maintain high standards to avoid fraud and ensure quality care.

About the Show:
Telemedicine Talks explores the evolving world of digital health, helping physicians navigate new opportunities, regulatory challenges, and career transitions in telemedicine.

About the Guest:
Dr. Mark Chmiela is a double board-certified anesthesiologist and pain management physician practicing in Las Vegas. Part of a large pain medicine group, he serves a diverse patient population, including underserved communities, managing chronic pain through medication, interventional therapies, and holistic care. Dr. Chmiela has extensive experience with telemedicine, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and advocates for its role in improving patient access when used appropriately.

Website: https://health.usnews.com/doctors/mark-chmiela-1414283

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-chmiela-1a5802194/

About the Hosts:

Connect with Phoebe Gutierrez:

https://www.linkedIn.com/in/pkgutierrez/

phoebe@telemedicinetalks.com 

Episode Transcription

 

 

Speaker 1: [00:00:00] Hey, welcome back everybody. Aloha and hello. Aloha means hello. Today we we have Dr. Mark Mila. He's a practicing pain doctor, living in Vegas, double board, certified in anesthesia and pain management. He wanted to jump on telemedicine talks. Love it, love everybody jumping on Tellus talks.

 

If you want a voice, please come on and ask, But he. Listened to the non telemedicine talk that we had and was like, Hey I'd love to raise my thoughts and what I was thinking and we were like, yeah, absolutely all about it. Mark, dude, thank you so much for jumping on.

 

Yeah, let's talk, let's tele medicine talks. That's good

 

Speaker 2: one. Awesome . Leo. Phoebe, thank you so much for having me on. I am super excited to talk with you guys tonight and let me start by saying I am super jealous of all that greenery I see in behind you guys. I'm in arid Las Vegas. It's dry, it's getting hot.

 

I would love to be out there with you guys and enjoying that beautiful weather you have there. So once again, thanks for having

 

Speaker 1: me [00:01:00] on. No, it's horrible out here. 75 degrees all year round. Hate it.

 

Speaker 3: No. Awesome. The funny thing with Leo is when it does drop under 70, he's in a really puffy North Face jacket.

 

Oh,

 

Speaker 1: cold.

 

Speaker 3: Cold. Total. Like

 

Speaker 1: miserable sounds, sounds horrible. Sounds

 

horrible. Miserable.

 

Speaker 1: Mark you're a pain doc. We were talking earlier and when Covid hit you were practicing telemedicine. I. Now you're not tell us

 

about

 

Speaker 1: that and why you moved away and the progression there and,

 

Speaker 2: yeah, sure.

 

Yeah. I think Covid was a stepping stone for telemedicine. It really gave. Physicians an opportunity to see patients during a time where social contact was restricted. You saw plenty of platforms pop up with telemedicine opportunities and we jumped on that. This allowed continuity of care.

 

We had, multiple patients who needed to be seen monthly for their medical care. And it just was not feasible to have them come to the [00:02:00] offices and sit in the waiting room and whatnot. So telemedicine was definitely used and it was used frequently. I would say 80 to 90% of our patients were incorporating telemedicine.

 

There was some, obviously technical difficulties with some of our elderly patients and perhaps some with lower socioeconomic status. and access was an issue, but. It was a tool that we relied on. It was wonderful at that time, and we did continue to incorporate it up until about 2024.

 

In 2024, we saw a noticeable shift. First and foremost, certain insurance companies stopped reimbursing for it altogether, so we weren't able to incorporate it for their for their patients. Second was reimbursements began to be cut. Initially Pretty reasonable. And then, some insurance companies were cutting it by half or even more than that.

 

From, working in private practice, obviously, we're here to serve the community, but, you have to balance your budget. And unfortunately, it's just if you want to deliver appropriate medical care then you have [00:03:00] to, spend time with patients and give them the appropriate time.

 

And if you are. Revenue is getting cut in half. It's just not going to work. So that was another thing that really did influence our shift in paradigm. And then, there were some regulatory issues too about having to sign up and get credentialed with certain platforms and whatnot.

 

And it just was not feasible. And with, covid restrictions being lifted and patients getting used to it. We had to transition. So initially we didn't go straight from telemedicine to in office visit. We did okay, you get to Telemed, telemed in office.

 

And then, so we warmed them up to it, and now we're pretty much all back to in office. I do have some patients, which I still see through Telemed, mainly if they're, living in another city or if there's some other issues or some other specific patients. But I would say we're back to about like 95% in office.

 

Speaker 1: And so during Covid, what kind of conditions what exactly were you doing? In telemedicine?

 

Speaker 2: Yeah, pretty much almost the [00:04:00] same thing that we would be doing as we'd be doing in office visits. Except for physical exams. So many of our patients, to give you an overview of what I do specifically, I'm a part of a fairly large pain medicine group here in Las Vegas. We have four locations all across the city. Currently we are at four physicians. We are bringing on a fifth physician later this year. We have at this time, I gotta double check now 'cause one's going on maternity leave.

 

1, 2, 3, 4, 5. We're going six mid-levels. And everyone's pretty much fully booked, so we see, as you can imagine, tons of patients. So in, the telemedicine sphere, what we were doing is mainly managing chronic pain patients. We have a fairly significant and large underserviced population here in Vegas.

 

That's a big reason why I'm here in Vegas, is that it's an underserved community. It is really difficult to get quality. Care here in Las Vegas, it's difficult to [00:05:00] get quality specialist care not only from a perspective of, access but not everyone who is, qualified and great, takes Medicaid and, certain insurances and.

 

So we as a practice we open our doors to pretty much everyone. There are a select few insurances that we don't take despite us trying to negotiate reasonable contracts with them, but we try to service everyone. We deal with, Medicaid patients significant.

 

Population is Medicaid, Medicare patients private insurance. We do personal injury and workman's comp. And so we pretty much service any and everyone that we can, and we're happy to do it, and that's what we wanna do. We wanna make a name stamp in our city, we wanna make sure that we take care of everyone , coming back to the initial question, which you mentioned what do we do? We manage these patients with chronic pain. As you can imagine, chronic pain is an epidemic. It is an epidemic in itself. It is a disease in itself. Chronic pain is not just a symptom, it is a disease. And with an aging population, you have more people developing [00:06:00] osteoarthritis.

 

You have more people developing neck and back issues. You haveyoung patients, old patients rich and poor who all deal with some form of chronic pain, or at least some form of pain throughout their life. And we are there to help. And because primary care physicians are stressed here in the city.

 

The number of my patients who don't have a primary care physician and who can't. Be seen or it can't be seen reasonably, within a reasonable time is like insane. And despite me being an anesthesiologist and interventional pain management, like some of the stuff that I'm doing is just managing their chronic, non-pain related disease states.

 

Yeah. I have to always talk about blood pressure and diabetes. And, exercise and I have to tell them to go see this specialist. 'cause you really need to go get this checked out. And fortunately I have a good network of providers that I work with who, we help each other out.

 

It's Hey, can you get this guy in? So that's pretty much what I do on a day-to-day basis. So when it comes to chronic pain, we're managing pain conditions. And that involves anything [00:07:00] from being a quarterback to like making sure patients are eating healthy and exercising and going to physical therapy and dealing with the right depression and anxiety and having a zest for life and hobbies and making sure that they just don't sit at home and don't do anything.

 

Yeah. 'cause all of those are just like risk factors for developing pain. We do a lot of pharmaceutical prescriptions, right? We do non-opioid medications. We do opioid medications for those who qualify for that. And then a large portion of our practice is interventional pain management.

 

And that involves seeing if some injection therapies can help relieve some pains in patients who, who have those pains. As patients come in, whether it's in person or telemedicine, we are focused on trying to assess the burden of their pain, the intensity of their pain, how it affects their quality of life, their activities of daily living, and we try to obtain reasonable goals of care.

 

That's it. What are our patients goals of what do they wanna do? Vegas is a, it's, I golf I got a lot of patients. A [00:08:00] lot of my older patients love to golf. It's great golfing here in Las Vegas, right? And some of these patients come and say, Hey, I just wanna go play nine holes.

 

Let's see how we can do that. And the mode, the medium in which we provide that service, whether it's telemedicine or in person, I think there's so subtle differences, but the end goal is the same. Let's try to better our patient's

 

Speaker 1: lives Now. So covid hit you can't see anybody, right?

 

You can't see anybody face to face. So how did you question one is how did a lot of the stuff you were just talking about, I. It doesn't have to be face-to-face, right? Or not necessarily face-to-face, but in person, right? 'cause you can use video, so forth and so on. So what did you see?

 

How did you evolve your practice to, fit within those, within telemedicine? And, you, mentioned also too, your payers were paying out, right? You were getting paid by your payers. How did they figure the change out? How, once Covid stopped and they're like, okay, we're not gonna pay you for the service that you're probably doing so [00:09:00] well.

 

It's probably the same kind of service. What kind of reason did they give you, if they gave you any to stop the

 

Speaker 2: payments? they didn't give us any specific reason. I can understand where, there's potential for. Abuse, right?

 

Like any system can be abused. Like telemedicine can be abused. You can do a telemedicine visit in a minute if you wanted to, you literally can do it. Hey, how you doing? What are you here for? Med refills? Okay, bye. Is that proper medicine? Is it I don't think so.

 

I think there's a standard that has to be set. this is how I wanted to phrase the pros andthe cons the benefits. Telemedicine is a tool. It is a tool to augment your practice for the right patient.

 

That's what it is. It's a wonderful tool. I have patients in wheelchairs that I feel horrible for them, that they have to lug themselves across the city to come see me for. Stable medication management. That's really what it is. They have to come in, sit in the lobby, fill out a [00:10:00] form, get wheeled into a room, have my medical assistant ask them questions that I can frankly ask them myself, update the medical chart, which doesn't play a part in my medical decision making.

 

Like all of that, like if you ever see a medical chart, it's like ridiculous. Everything that I'm looking there. I'm like, who cares? Quite frankly, I'm being facetious. Let's be honest. I'm being facetious. Oh, no,

 

Speaker 1: absolutely. I agree. But I agree. When I look at a medical chart, it's the first lines of HPI.

 

Yeah. And MDM and everything else is billing

 

Speaker 2: junk. Billing junk. But you have to do it. Yeah. I only look at what I write. What I write is what matters because it's my train of thought, right? And, you have to have things listed. But what, like, why are we doing this to some patients?

 

It's so much better for these patients to come in and that doesn't mean it's a replacement for a yearly physical. It's not a replacement for doing a proper physical exam on patients who have new findings that warrants putting your hands on them. But for certain patients, for certain consultations, it's a wonderful tool.

 

So they didn't really give us an answer about why it is. But you [00:11:00] can Google it. there was fraud. Yeah. There were groups that were taking advantage of telemedicine, and how do you prove that someone showed up to a telemedicine appointment?

 

Like how do you prove it? You can't. I can prove that a patient came to see me, they filled out a sheet, you know that's their handwriting, that's their name at the top. They circled their butt. 'cause they have butt pain today. And and so they came and see me and we billed accordingly.

 

I saw the patient and I provided care With telemedicine it's rife for abuse. If it's not standardized in some way or monitored in some way. Yeah, so I can understand,

 

But, realistically because you're cutting out a lot of that administrative portion you're cutting out a lot of the fact that these patients have to be roomed and sit there and all that stuff. Like you cut down on the time. Yeah. So maybe I'd spend 15 minutes with a patient in person.

 

Maybe with telemedicine I can do it in eight minutes. Or 10 minutes. So should I be able to bill the same as an inpatient visit? That's an argument that, someone can be for or against, but I'm empathetic enough to know that like you, new systems, [00:12:00] especially ones that are brought on by necessity, like covid, this was not a planned decision.

 

This was like, oh my goodness, what the heck are we gonna do? We're forcing this. So we wing it. I think we winged it pretty darn good. I. And now everyone is trying to figure out what's a reasonable approach.

 

Speaker 3: Yeah. and I think toolike your point, and like I always try to emphasize like from a regulator stance, like to your point, if something is so large that they can't monitor it, then like insurance is a little bit more lenient, right?

 

Look at how, like they monitor DME, look at how they monitor certain things that are just like. They actually have no way of monitoring it, therefore they're actually gonna say it's not allowable. That's one of the big things like Leo, you and I have talked about. Yeah. Like telemedicine for Medicare for example.

 

Like it's just like it's rife with fraud. They lack the effective oversight to be able to like oversee and manage it. And because of that, it's we're just gonna have to put a kibosh to it. Yeah. Because like We can't spend taxpayer [00:13:00] dollars and not actually have an effective

 

Speaker 1: monitoring tool.

 

Yeah. They go to the lowest denominator, right? Yeah. So yeah. if they're not able to do it for all then they're stuck. And you're right. It is right for fraud. And we've seen it. and we've talked about kind of certain cases of fraud and whatnot, but you're right it's hard to argue against how valuable it was.

 

And you're right, it's not for everybody. It's not for every case. Yes. There's a time and place for it. But yeah, I think, using it, utilizing it appropriately and for the right patients will definitely and could augment your practice and really good for the patient.

 

Really good. You can

 

Speaker 2: augment nearly every practice. I honestly don't think, I can't think off the top of my head that like a certain specialty can't take advantage of it. I can contact a dermatologist and be like, Hey, I got this. I don't know. Rash. They don't need to touch the rash.

 

Yeah, they just need to see it. If I have a good quality camera on my phone, I can take a picture and send it. I can get a diagnosis right there. I can go to a family physician, and [00:14:00] again, as I mentioned before, I don't think it's a replacement for, certain aspects of medicine, which requires you to go see the physician and actually have them put their hands on you.

 

I think there's, as an aside, I can tell you I saw a patient during Covid who was coming to see me, a few times. I saw him like maybe once or twice in clinic, but I saw him on telemedicine and one of the days he came into clinic he was coughing in front of me and I was like, a little bit concerned.

 

And I noticed that he had significant clubbing in his fingers. And I said, how long have you been coughing? And he said something like six or eight months. I don't remember. Are you losing weight? Yes. How much weight? I don't know. 30 pounds? Not intended. No. And I said, did you talk to your PCP since then?

 

Yeah, I've seen them a couple times. It's telemedicine? Telemedicine. It's okay, here having someone. In front of you with these symptoms warrants, further investigation, right? Yeah. Ordered CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis. And what do you think he had, diffuse metastatic cancer?

 

Stayed with me for about four or five months and then he died. He was a young guy, late forties, early fifties, and [00:15:00] so again, that's not anything against telemedicine. I think it augments your practice, but you still have to do proper medical screening. You know it's preventative medicine.

 

As long as you are using telemedicine to augment your clinic, I think it's great. Have your patients come in, you have a family practice, have the patients come in for their yearly physical, they wanna set up a telemedicine in between to talk about X, Y, Z, their diabetes control. I don't need a, primary care physician does not need to see a patient for diabetic control in the absence of other systemic symptoms that, edema, wound, wound issues that they might be developing.

 

If it's just Hey, my sugar's a little bit wonky, what can we do? That's like a medication titration issue. That's like a discussion, an education, and that can be done over the phone, but come in every year, get auscultated, make sure you haven't developed a murmur. You're a smoker.

 

Let's make sure you don't have some aortic aneurysm. That could be, palpated or auscultated. I don't even remember. I don't do that. I was about to say, but it has nothing to do with me. It has to do with what are [00:16:00] we here to do? I'm here to practice medicine. I wanna do it well, I wanna do it well.

 

And I hope that any tool that we, I'm not a lu like, and another thing going back to why we should look at this in an optimistic light is we can't be Luddites. We have to understand that technology is advancing, everything is getting scary. I'm getting older. Everything is scary to me, everything new is scary.

 

No, it can't be scary. I have to learn how to incorporate it because if I don't do it, somebody else will. I. Somebody else will do it better if I wait and delay. So if there's new technology, take advantage of it. Learn it. Don't be scared. Find out how it fits your practice and how it fits your life and how you can use it for its advantage and then don't use it for the things that isn't appropriate.

 

Oh,

 

I

 

Speaker 1: totally agree. Totally. And this is the way it's going, right? The, God, I'm gonna sound like an old man now. The old, the younger generation. I'm getting old, but the younger this is what they expect, right? They expect, yes, annuals have to go in, but they expect, instantaneous.

 

I wanna get on, [00:17:00] I wanna get on now. I want to talk to a doctor now. Let me talk to a doctor. I don't wanna wait in a waiting room. I don't wanna drive 20 minutes away, just like you're saying. Let me talk to somebody in my lunch break. Let me talk to somebody on my way home from

 

Speaker 2: work.

 

Keep your eyes on. Oh, it doesn't stop there. I've had telemedicine BA visits with patients in their

 

Speaker 1: bed. Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. And there's some, I'm like, just please put some clothes on. Put some clothes on. I don't wanna see

 

Speaker 2: that. I swear to you, I'm not joking. I had someone do a telemedicine visit with me while they were showering.

 

Speaker 3: From a patient perspective, yes. You don't know when the telemedicine visit's gonna start, and so you're just going on with your life. Yeah. I hear it's fine

 

Speaker 1: with the first,

 

Speaker 3: you don't go down. I've never done that, but I'm just saying you don't know, you're on the other end, like, when is this video thing gonna start?

 

Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. No, but I understand. That's the benefit of it too, like you can't do much when you're sitting in a lobby. I try to keep, I try to keep. A pretty timely clinic, yeah. But you can't predict everything. And sometimes patients have to wait. No, they don't wait.

 

[00:18:00] As long as sometimes they wait at surgeon's office where I've heard hours of waiting. But people wait. And if you're waiting in an office for hours, you have better things to do than just sit there and Scroll your phone. You have a way to live. And so yeah, I think identifying the patients who are, who ha have transportation issues, which are numerous, at least in my practice, numerous patients who have transportation issues, who have a difficult time getting into clinic.

 

They take the public bus, they miss a bus, they're late for their clinic, and what am I supposed to do? I'm supposed to cancel their clinic. No, I can't because then I've just made their already hard life harder. So what do I do? I fit 'em in. Take a seat, fit 'em in. Could this be

 

solved? That's

 

Speaker 2: a good point.

 

Could it be solved with a telemedicine visit? Absolutely. Yeah. Some people, end up Ubering. They're worried that they're gonna be late for the appointment. That just costs someone 20 bucks. That's 20 bucks. They don't have, and for some of my patients, 20 bucks is a lot of money.

 

It's a lot

 

of money.

 

Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely. They have to take off of work. They, some are working two, three jobs, right? They don't have that time. They have to find [00:19:00] childcare. They don't have that money. Yeah absolutely. Role. And, definitely one of my biggest arguments for being a proponent telemedicine, for sure.

 

Speaker 3: Yeah. It's just, again the way that I always try to frame it is just because again, like I come from like the Medicaid world where why is it that like you and I and everybody else can get a telemedicine visit through private insurance, but we're gonna make the. people with the hardest lives, the medical conditions, the unemployed, the lower income, jump through hoops and travel three hours to go to a doctor's.

 

I mean in like where I'm at California, like there are people that have to travel hours to get to a doctor. So to me, I can't make heads or tails of it from just the policy side of it. Of like, why you would not wanna make, like we need to reduce the barriers, not add more.

 

Yeah. And then again, like of course, like there's gonna be the instances where no, you need to go see somebody or something sees a little I don't know, suspicious, it doesn't seem right. Like you wanna see somebody in, in person. That's a different [00:20:00] story. But I don't know, trying to encourage getting care versus.

 

The idea of let's make it as difficult as possible to me is just, I don't

 

Speaker 2: know. I agree. And, coming back to what do we what as a physician, what do I do? Mostly I listen, at least in my practice with pain is so subjective. Yes. I rely on imaging findings and I rely on the physical examination to help work through differential diagnoses.

 

But if you put me in a room with a patient and I let them talk, like nine times outta 10, they'll tell me what's wrong with them. I don't need to put my hands on them to confirm it. Now I do, and it's always that additional piece of information, but most people, you can get the information you need as a provider just by listening to them.

 

For most cases. And so I agree lowering barriers to entry is paramount. And we gotta make sure that it's [00:21:00] reasonable and we gotta make sure, we gotta trust ourselves and we gotta trust everyone that everyone will take advantage of this tool and not abuse it. And. Because, there's a rife

 

It's easy to just be mediocre. Like it's easy to be mediocre. It act, you act you actually put a little bit of effort in if you wanna be good and you should. And I think, and at least in our field, we should actually always strive to, do that. We should always strive to do our best. Because for me.

 

A patient's sitting in front of me they are patient, they are Joe, they're married, they're Sue. And yes, when I'm in the room and I'm listening to their complaints and their concerns, like I am empathetic and I understand them, but that empathy doesn't last very long because as soon as I leave the room, I'm over to the next patient and I have to deal with whatever is bothering them.

 

And for my own sanity, I can't take that home. I can't take that home to my wife and kids. I have to leave it at work. But I always have to remind myself that person sitting in front of me could be my mom, could be my dad, no, could be [00:22:00] my wife, could be my kids. So with any type of tool, as I mentioned, we have an obligation to take advantage of it for what it gives us and not abuse it.

 

Speaker 1: Now with telemedicine I've heard from a bunch of people. Because of the extra time, right? You have extra time to sit there. People are more comfortable delving deeper into their personal lives. The doctors feel actually a stronger connection because they're, they can now take a little bit more time to, talk to the patient and sit there, right?

 

Because you know it well. It's primary care. You sit there, it's 15 minute appointments and you knock it out, five minutes. You're only in front of the patient for five minutes. But with telemedicine, because of the lack of the other barriers, you're there longer. Did you find that kind of in your case as well, or how did you think, how can you compare your interactions with your patients via telemedicine versus,

 

Yeah.

 

Brick and mortar?

 

Speaker 2: I have to be honest with you, and I have to actually disagree with you, all right. I do think that with telemedicine you [00:23:00] can. You can spend more time with patients under telemedicine, but I don't think you actually do because there's nothing more personal than an in-person evaluation.

 

And I can only speak for myself. But I shoot the ish with my patients before I dive down to what's going on. I love to ask what's going on? You do any fishing? Did you go golfing? Did you travel anywhere? How's so and so because I have, little notes that I put into their chart because for some of my patients, I'm one of the only people that they interact with throughout their daily life.

 

Some people really just come just to

 

talk.

 

Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. And I don't like The real physical distance, and I actually think like an emotional distance with telemedicine. That's the only thing that I think is, in disagreement with you is that I really enjoy the in-person experience, shaking someone's hand, right?

 

I think for some people is nice. Looking them [00:24:00] in the eye is nice. Just having a presence I think is nice. That doesn't mean that has to be the case with every visit, but I do think that There's something nice. It's the same thing like when you go to a restaurant and you're sitting with your friends and everyone's on the phone what the hell is this?

 

What is going on? Put the phones down, put it down. Let's talk. Yeah. And that I might be aging myself. I don't think I'm old, but maybe I'm an old soul. But there's an aspect of technology That can border like depersonalization in some sense, right?

 

Like it can, it really does pull away. And so I would,

 

Speaker 3: I dunno I guess I see both sides a little bit. I see your perspective in terms of like having the in-person connection, but I also see like certain, like very specific industries where I think telemedicine has just.

 

Change the game. Like last week we talked to two obs that started menopause Clinic. And it's like for somebody like, again, like my age, who's been gaslit by every doctor who's no, you're not going through the change. And then it's like you talk to doctors who know what they're doing and it's oh, you are like, I think [00:25:00] there's like these certain industries where.

 

It could I think it does take some stigma away and I think people are a little bit more willing to embrace it. Like I think like addiction medicine is like another field where like most people wouldn't wanna go in person to a clinic because there's like a weird stigma. But if you allow telemedicine,

 

it takes that away. Like I know like that was mister's

 

Speaker 1: big thing. Yeah. I was just about to say, prep medicine and that community, they're more apt to say,

 

Speaker 3: reach out.

 

Speaker 1: Yeah.

 

Speaker 3: I actually, I think

 

Speaker 2: it's, I agree. I do agree. I would say that, I am only speaking through my personal

 

experience.

 

Yes.

 

Speaker 2: But I definitely can understand other industries or even other specialties in medicine where that type of personal like interaction isn't as important or That perceived distance is actually of benefit, right? Where you can feel you can be a little bit more vulnerable to certain people because you're not there, they're not seeing you, you are just someone there on a [00:26:00] screen.

 

Definitely, I definitely understand that perspective. So again, finding the right. Opportunity. Yeah. And the right circumstance to use it is great. And it should be offered. It's about choice, right? Yeah. It's about choice. Give patients choice. And they will make the right decision for themselves.

 

Yeah. That's it.

 

Speaker 3: Yeah. I have a serious question for you. Very serious. Okay. What are your thoughts on IV hydration?

 

Speaker 2: You got work. You got me? Doesn't work. You got me . I got my ba, I got my So shadow. Pete here in Las Vegas, he's one of my best friends here. He is an interventional cardiologist fantastic physician if you guys are ever in Las Vegas and suffer a heart attack because you win millions at.

 

He at the table, then you're gonna go see Peter Lesinski, who is a wonderful interventional cardiologist, and he is getting married soon. So we are celebrating his bachelor [00:27:00] party actually next month. And yeah, so IV hydration is definitely wonderful in certain circumstances. Oh. So whether or not I'll be providing such services or receiving such services are not to be disclosed on this podcast, but in terms of IV hydration, quite frankly, this comes down to another aspect of medicine where it's you are seeing an increase in certain niche services, some concierge type services. And I think for the most part it's great. I think that it's wonderful that you can provide patients with treatment that they electively choose.

 

I think there is always, I. The concern that you improperly market those services, or you make false claims. Because there's a lot of patients who come and say oh, I was promised this, and that's like, where's the literature that supports that? On the other hand, it's for me, especially with dealing with chronic pain patients, like placebo is real, placebo is so real.

 

I don't care. What helps, I care, but if you come and you tell me that like [00:28:00] you sleep with rocks in your hand at night and it takes care of your knee arthritis, like I am giving you two thumbs up and pretending to order those same rocks on Amazon. And so when it comes to like certain therapies like ivu hydration or any type of NAD supplementation, like IV or glutathione or some, even some of the peptides like BPC 1 57 and CV 500, it's like there's evidence.

 

For a lot of these treatments. And I think that it's, the most part, without getting too political, should be accessible to patients. And if patients find benefit from it, and if the services are offered in an ethical way with patients well-informed, it's all about informed consent.

 

Yeah,

 

Speaker 2: informed consent. That's what it's like. Tell the patient what's actually gonna happen what the risks are, what the benefits are, what the studies show. And let the patient decide. set your price and see if, and see what the market is. Some people might do something similar, cheaper.

 

Some people might offer a better service and charge more and great, there's, you can do it in cosmetics, like tons of people go get Botox, right? Yeah. Botox prices are like, I know, expensive, cheap. It's like same product, like what are you really paying for The hands? Okay, great. The outcome.

 

[00:29:00] Fantastic. So I am, realistically like all for it, for the most part. All

 

for it. Yeah.

 

Speaker 1: Hey sorry to cut you, but wrapping it up. Last thoughts.

 

Speaker 2: I think I definitely spoke a lot tonight no, that's the point. You guys and thank you for giving me a platform to speak my mind. But yeah, to loop back with how telemedicine is currently offered in the community, at least from my perspective, it's it's really restricted and I think we should have it available.

 

To providers and to patients. I think there are definitely clear benefits in certain circumstances, and I think it benefits the provider. I think it benefits the patient. I think it benefits the system as a whole because all it comes down to is patient accessibility, to appropriate healthcare and to reduce barriers to healthcare.

 

So any way that we can do that, I think is a plus.

 

Speaker 1: Yeah. Awesome. Awesome. Yeah, thank you so much for your time. Totally enjoyed talking to you. And yeah, hopefully we find [00:30:00] time to talk more. Absolutely. Thank you and everybody, definitely. Check on back the next episode. If you have any questions, concerns, drop us the line at info@telemedicinetalk.com.

 

Thank you guys so much, Leo. Phoebe, thank you so much. Have

 

Speaker 2: a great night.

 

Speaker 3: Thank you. All right, bye. Thank you,